tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2660731263604854712.post7611033466535272943..comments2023-11-01T02:19:24.056-07:00Comments on Fastersite: Chrome's 10 CachesThe Nerdbirderhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10788220750917048380noreply@blogger.comBlogger14125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2660731263604854712.post-26335366991081833262022-12-05T03:01:15.999-08:002022-12-05T03:01:15.999-08:00Based on these standards, we really feel the best ...Based on these standards, we really feel the best video poker bonuses are under. This is a good distance of saying you could rest assured our payouts are as excessive as the best casinos and, in reality, with the Mega Jackpot, are even greater. And, Video Poker Classic is a truly fair game <a href="https://로스트아크.com/1xbet.html" rel="nofollow">1xbet</a> phrases of|when it comes to|by means of} how palms are dealt nicely as|in addition to} the payouts for every of our paytables.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2660731263604854712.post-19269560865026352002013-11-08T08:52:20.442-08:002013-11-08T08:52:20.442-08:00Hi tony
Chrome's cache control is a big heada...Hi tony<br />Chrome's cache control is a big headache especially if u want to refresh the page when someone click back buttons .I have a php application which dont work at all in chrome because of caching issue.Any suggestion how i can get rid of that issue in php.I have tried to refresh apge,disable caching etc already but no success.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2660731263604854712.post-1634577218351761212011-07-06T06:59:54.781-07:002011-07-06T06:59:54.781-07:00@Brett did you ever find an answer to your questio...@Brett did you ever find an answer to your question? I'm encountering the same issue with Chrome not caching content from a server using a self-signed certificate for SSL.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2660731263604854712.post-57528163890714292272011-04-29T22:00:06.013-07:002011-04-29T22:00:06.013-07:00Lots of incredibly good reading here, thanks! I wa...Lots of incredibly good reading here, thanks! I was searching on yahoo when I observed your post, I’m going to add your feed to Google Reader, I look forward to more from you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2660731263604854712.post-3562563962562006282011-04-18T05:54:24.487-07:002011-04-18T05:54:24.487-07:00@Aaron To clarify the "public" vs "...@Aaron To clarify the "public" vs "private" options for cache-control normally only applied to shared caches (e.g. a squid proxy), as a "private" cache is can still be cached locally by a browser, but not by a shared proxy (learnt a bit about caching from this: http://www.mnot.net/cache_docs/)<br /><br />@Tony I came across an help forum post where a developer found that content served through an HTTPS server with a self-signed certificate wasn't caching content with cache-specific directives. We have found similar behaviour with Chrome only, but have not isolated the cause. Is this behaviour expected? (reference: http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Chrome/thread?tid=2f7803d278406baf&hl=en)Brett Cavehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15727629589974216920noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2660731263604854712.post-7690666185199231762011-04-08T14:35:00.213-07:002011-04-08T14:35:00.213-07:00Hi Tony,
This is very nice article. It has answe...Hi Tony, <br /><br />This is very nice article. It has answered several questions I have. Thx!<br /><br />One further question is: how does http memory cache and http disk cache work together? any pointer to the implementation in the codes?<br /><br />Also, is there any rationale behind the cache size numbers?Zhen Wanghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15823357859940210612noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2660731263604854712.post-48903260301627083112011-03-20T18:36:34.846-07:002011-03-20T18:36:34.846-07:00I love this post – totally kewl!!! Well done! I’m ...I love this post – totally kewl!!! Well done! I’m coming back to this one …Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2660731263604854712.post-3439620418569643502011-02-15T17:12:22.436-08:002011-02-15T17:12:22.436-08:00thanks amigo! great post!thanks amigo! great post!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2660731263604854712.post-3665894980598400232011-02-07T16:25:19.191-08:002011-02-07T16:25:19.191-08:00thanks Tony, Please permit us to publish a link to...thanks Tony, Please permit us to publish a link to your site from IT Server Press http://serverpress.wordpress.com<br /><br />ThanksUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08180920527159573584noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2660731263604854712.post-65652124713352042452011-02-07T16:22:36.462-08:002011-02-07T16:22:36.462-08:00Cool summary! I think you could really separate ou...Cool summary! I think you could really separate out all the HTML5 caches, and add Web SQL Database and File access (http://www.html5rocks.com/tutorials/file/filesystem/) too.Michael Mahemoffhttp://softwareas.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2660731263604854712.post-54114018373593855172011-02-07T10:15:28.799-08:002011-02-07T10:15:28.799-08:00@Aaron - Chrome doesn't need Cache-Control:pub...@Aaron - Chrome doesn't need Cache-Control:public to cache an https subresource.<br /><br />Eric Lawrence speaks for IE here: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ieinternals/archive/2010/04/21/internet-explorer-may-bypass-cache-for-cross-domain-https-content.aspx<br /><br />And FF changed its behavior here:<br />https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531801The Nerdbirderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10788220750917048380noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2660731263604854712.post-9962941756808509952011-02-07T03:21:20.788-08:002011-02-07T03:21:20.788-08:00Hi Tony,
Nice article. Txs.
I am seeking the answ...Hi Tony,<br /><br />Nice article. Txs.<br />I am seeking the answer to this question:<br /><br />what is the policy in Chrome for (disk) caching HTTPS content?<br />E.g. a .css file sent over HTTPS<br /><br />Does Chrome want the Cache-Control:Public header? Is a normal Expires or Cache-Control header sufficient?Aaronhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02944467793781623269noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2660731263604854712.post-50254485502601552092011-02-06T15:17:05.491-08:002011-02-06T15:17:05.491-08:00@Mihai Parparita - Yep. I think it is considered a...@Mihai Parparita - Yep. I think it is considered a security benefit to wall off the cache for each process, but I not sure about that. Seems like sharing some memory could be a big win if possible.<br /><br />There are actually a lot of subtleties to the size limits and how it is divided. The source is here: http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/chrome/browser/renderer_host/web_cache_manager.h?view=markupThe Nerdbirderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10788220750917048380noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2660731263604854712.post-16789009090660422372011-02-06T14:18:02.065-08:002011-02-06T14:18:02.065-08:00MemoryCache looks like it's per (renderer) pro...MemoryCache looks like it's per (renderer) process, is that actually the case? Does this mean that for resources that appear on multiple distinct sites (e.g. Analytics JS) we'll end up with multiple copies of it in memory, one per process?Mihai Parparitahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12343650264888591427noreply@blogger.com